On the heels of layoff announcements from mammoths like Amazon, Starbucks, Oracle, Nike, Carter’s, and others, there’s a disturbing reflex in corporate life that makes me want to slam my head against a whiteboard.
Quarterly numbers dip, shareholders twitch, and some genius in the boardroom says, “I know! Let’s fire some people.”
Apparently, the fastest way to fix a business is to kick out the very people who keep it running.
It’s like watching someone complain their car won’t start — then take a baseball bat to the engine.
“People Are Our Greatest Asset!” (Until They’re Not.)
Every company loves to brag about being “people-centric” right up until the revenue line hiccups. Suddenly, all those smiling “Teamwork!” posters in the hallways start to feel like set dressing in a hostage video.
The first “cost-saving” ideas?
- Slash salaries and benefits.
- Freeze hiring.
- Announce “strategic realignment.”
(Translation: you’re fired, but we bought cupcakes.)
Funny how “do more with less” always means “you do more while we keep the same bonuses.”
Simon Sinek Said It Better (and Cleaner)
Simon Sinek recently dropped a video and blog post that should be mandatory viewing for every exec who thinks layoffs are a leadership strategy.
He said:
“Layoffs aren’t strategy. They’re a symptom of a system that’s lost its heart.”
Boom. Right there.
If your business model only works when times are good, it’s not a business — it’s a fair-weather hobby.
You don’t see ship captains tossing sailors overboard the moment the waves get choppy.
(Well… unless it’s a metaphor for modern management, in which case: spot on.)
Why Do They Always Go After the People First?
Because it’s easy.
Because numbers on a spreadsheet don’t cry or post angry LinkedIn updates.
Because it makes it look like someone’s “doing something.”
And because too many leaders are still stuck in the 1980s, believing employees are “cost centers” instead of the reason the fucking company exists.
Cutting people first is lazy leadership.
It’s management by panic.
It’s like treating a heart attack by removing the heart — problem solved, right?
What Real Leaders Do Instead
When the numbers dip, the grown-ups in the room pause.
They ask:
- Why did this happen?
- What can we change that doesn’t involve crushing morale?
- Is our strategy outdated, or are we just scared to evolve?
Maybe it’s time to re-examine pricing. Or invest in training. Or perish the thought — talk to the people on the front lines who actually know what’s going wrong.
Because those same “costs” you’re eager to cut? They’re also your innovators, your problem solvers, your culture carriers. When you gut them, you’re not saving money. You’re setting the place on fire for heat.
You Don’t Build Trust by Throwing People Overboard
Every time a company does mass layoffs, they torch the one thing they can’t buy back: trust.
The survivors don’t think, “Thank goodness I’m still here.”
They think, “When’s it my turn?”
Productivity tanks. Creativity flatlines. Everyone spends half their day on Indeed “just in case.” But hey, the quarterly report looks slightly better, so… cheers?
If You Lead, Then Actually Lead
Here’s the deal: if you call yourself a leader, act like one.
Cutting people should be your last resort, not your first impulse.
Be curious, not cruel.
Fix the system, not the humans in it.
Sinek’s point — and mine — is simple: people are the business. They’re not overhead. They’re oxygen. When you cut them, you choke the company.
Bottom Line
If you really believe in your company’s “purpose” or “mission statement,” you fight for your people when it’s hard — not just when you’re cashing profit-share checks.
Layoffs might make the numbers look prettier in the short term, but they hollow you out in the long run. And then all you’ve got left are some lonely executives wondering why nobody wants to come back to the office.
So here’s your new quarterly goal:
Save the people first. Fix the problem second. Report the profits third.
In that order. Every time.
Because people aren’t the problem.
They’re the only reason you still have one to solve.


Leave a Reply